Thank you! I appreciate the memes that you and many others share. Happy to steal and be stolen from. (Memes only! All yall keep yer mits off my things!)
"In fact you should expect everything to get worse/stranger/obtuser/zanier/illogicaler."
At first read, I thought that in the (important, you will agree) interest of logical parallel construction, "worse" should be "worser".
Upon further reflection, I thought it should not, but it would take too long to explain my reasoning, so you'll have to figure it out yourself. Wait! You already did, so never mind.
You may blame SimulationCommander for my appearance here on your excellent newsletter. Also, congratulations for your memetically found success.
Addendum: Shouldn't there also be a guy in top hat and tux walking a die? Hmm...no. That would violate logical (or is it logicaler?) parallel construction.
Thank for the kind regards and recognizing someone that sees words weirdly too!
To your credit, I started with worser, then decided that I should start somewhere in the more “normal rules” to give some distinction between worse and illogicaler.
Very good. I like!
Thank you for this and the share.
Good ones! I too, saw enormous growth when I posted my first memes, so...I just stuck with it. Good job man! DoG approved..
Thank you! I appreciate the memes that you and many others share. Happy to steal and be stolen from. (Memes only! All yall keep yer mits off my things!)
Omg, I will never unsee that stove!
Love these memes Antila! Especially the kitty. Yes... Waaaayyy too much 'nip.
Thanks Jenny!
Awesome!!!
U sqeme
I sqeme
We all sqeme
4 UR meme.
Dale! Good to read from you!
The Lawyer Dog left me howling!
/drumriff
Someone do just headlines in memes. That’s all one can stand to read now. Headlines, memes. Love you DoG!
In the interest of your newsletter description:
"In fact you should expect everything to get worse/stranger/obtuser/zanier/illogicaler."
At first read, I thought that in the (important, you will agree) interest of logical parallel construction, "worse" should be "worser".
Upon further reflection, I thought it should not, but it would take too long to explain my reasoning, so you'll have to figure it out yourself. Wait! You already did, so never mind.
You may blame SimulationCommander for my appearance here on your excellent newsletter. Also, congratulations for your memetically found success.
Addendum: Shouldn't there also be a guy in top hat and tux walking a die? Hmm...no. That would violate logical (or is it logicaler?) parallel construction.
Thank for the kind regards and recognizing someone that sees words weirdly too!
To your credit, I started with worser, then decided that I should start somewhere in the more “normal rules” to give some distinction between worse and illogicaler.
Ha! It was "illogicaler" that got me thinking in the first place.